We are working in a research project about electrochemical non-faradic biosensors development. Similar to the forum question made by Borges Cleaver (AD2 as a Electrochemical Impedance Meter: Is possible?) we want to characterize our systems by EIS technique, using the digilent AD2-IA. We can avoid the reference electrode because the non-faradic nature of our electrochemical system.
We have some questions that are difficult to solve reading the manuals or the forum (may be, we miss something of course).
Indeed:
1- In order to select the wires to adapt the system impedance correctly. What is the real value of the impedance at the Wave Generator?
2- If we set the Adapter (IA) configuration to perform an impedance analyzer measure (BODE). It automatically fixed only ONE resistor during all the measure or it may be changing among the time?
3- Taking into consideration that yielded wires could be better in order to avoid noise (inductive and capacitive) in the frequency-dependent DUT impedance measurement, why the IA was builded without BNC connector (for example)? Does Digilent offer some alternative solution or recommendation to this topic?
Question
EzeStare
Hello.
We are working in a research project about electrochemical non-faradic biosensors development. Similar to the forum question made by Borges Cleaver (AD2 as a Electrochemical Impedance Meter: Is possible?) we want to characterize our systems by EIS technique, using the digilent AD2-IA. We can avoid the reference electrode because the non-faradic nature of our electrochemical system.
We have some questions that are difficult to solve reading the manuals or the forum (may be, we miss something of course).
Indeed:
1- In order to select the wires to adapt the system impedance correctly. What is the real value of the impedance at the Wave Generator?
2- If we set the Adapter (IA) configuration to perform an impedance analyzer measure (BODE). It automatically fixed only ONE resistor during all the measure or it may be changing among the time?
3- Taking into consideration that yielded wires could be better in order to avoid noise (inductive and capacitive) in the frequency-dependent DUT impedance measurement, why the IA was builded without BNC connector (for example)? Does Digilent offer some alternative solution or recommendation to this topic?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
5 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now