I recently successfully completed a web server application for the chipKIT WF32 using the Digilent IP stack with the Arduino IDE. I wanted to see how difficult it would be to port the same web server application to the chipKIT PRO MX7 processor board. There appeared to be only a one or two lines of code that had to be commented out to make the conversion. The The Adruino IDE reported "No target found". So I backed off to the simple "ChipKIT_Blink" sketch and had the same result - "No target found". I reverted to the MPIDE environment using the same hardware and the sketch loaded and ran correctly. So I'm thinking the problem is with the Arduino IDE or the chipKIT core library.
I am using Arduino rev 1.6.5 and chipkit-core-windows.16778041.v1.0.0-21-glc4b889.zip. Keith recommended removing R159 (no easy task for an older person and glued down R402 resistors.) Has anyone had any success programming the chipKIT PRO MX7 using the Arduino IDE?
Question
Flyline
I recently successfully completed a web server application for the chipKIT WF32 using the Digilent IP stack with the Arduino IDE. I wanted to see how difficult it would be to port the same web server application to the chipKIT PRO MX7 processor board. There appeared to be only a one or two lines of code that had to be commented out to make the conversion. The The Adruino IDE reported "No target found". So I backed off to the simple "ChipKIT_Blink" sketch and had the same result - "No target found". I reverted to the MPIDE environment using the same hardware and the sketch loaded and ran correctly. So I'm thinking the problem is with the Arduino IDE or the chipKIT core library.
I am using Arduino rev 1.6.5 and chipkit-core-windows.16778041.v1.0.0-21-glc4b889.zip. Keith recommended removing R159 (no easy task for an older person and glued down R402 resistors.) Has anyone had any success programming the chipKIT PRO MX7 using the Arduino IDE?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
10 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.