Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'synthesis'.



More search options

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • News
    • New Users Introduction
    • Announcements
  • Digilent Technical Forums
    • FPGA
    • Digilent Microcontroller Boards
    • Non-Digilent Microcontrollers
    • Add-on Boards
    • Scopes & Instruments
    • LabVIEW
    • FRC
    • Other
  • General Discussion
    • Project Vault
    • Learn
    • Suggestions & Feedback
    • Buy, Sell, Trade
    • Sales Questions
    • Off Topic
    • Educators
    • Technical Based Off-Topic Discussions

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


AIM


MSN


Website URL


ICQ


Yahoo


Jabber


Skype


Location


Interests

Found 2 results

  1. Hey everyone! I'm new to the forum (and fairly new to VHDL as well), and I was hoping you could help me with a problem. I have a project that I'm working on in Vivado (currently it's just some of the inner-workings of a CPU in development), and I'm trying to implement a container that helps me test the design on my FPGA board (Spartan 7 on a Digilent Arty-S7). The top-level module routes the clock input and reset button input on the FPGA in to the design (inverting the reset button input from active-low to active-high in the process), and routes a 4-bit vector out from the design to 4 LEDs on the board. The purpose is to monitor the high nibble of a 32-bit ALU calculation using the LEDs on the Arty board. The design works under behavioral simulation, and it elaborates correctly (see attached schematic of the elaborated design). However, when I synthesize the design, it is reduced to almost nothing -- with the clock and reset pins routed nowhere, and the LED pins routed to some buffers connected to ground. The entire internals of the design are removed (see included schematic of the synthesized design). Can anyone help me figure out why this is happening? Here are the sources of the upper levels of the design, and the relevant constraints that I've applied for the FPGA board: SOURCES: ---------------- -- pindelivery.vhd -- Routes package pins to logical units library IEEE; use IEEE.std_logic_1164.all; use IEEE.numeric_std.all; use work.cpu1_globals_1.all; entity pindelivery is Port ( clk_in : in STD_LOGIC; rst_in : in STD_LOGIC; leds_out : out STD_LOGIC_VECTOR (3 downto 0)); end pindelivery; architecture behavioral of pindelivery is component topLevel_debug port (clk : in std_logic; rst : in std_logic; led_out : out std_logic_vector(3 downto 0)); end component; signal rst_out : std_logic := '0'; begin rst_out <= not rst_in; tld1 : topLevel_debug port map (clk => clk_in, rst => rst_out, led_out => leds_out); end behavioral; ---------------- -- topLevel_debug.vhd -- Top-level module for debug library IEEE; use IEEE.std_logic_1164.all; use IEEE.numeric_std.all; use work.cpu1_globals_1.all; entity topLevel_debug is port ( clk : in std_logic; rst : in std_logic; led_out : out std_logic_vector (3 downto 0)); end topLevel_debug; architecture behavioral of topLevel_debug is component controlTest port (clk : in std_logic; rst : in std_logic; r0_highnibble : out std_logic_vector(3 downto 0)); end component; begin cpu1 : controlTest port map (clk => clk, rst => rst, r0_highnibble => led_out); end behavioral; ---------------- CONSTRAINTS: ---------------- ## Clock signal set_property -dict { PACKAGE_PIN F14 IOSTANDARD LVCMOS33 } [get_ports { clk_in }]; #IO_L13P_T2_MRCC_15 Sch=uclk create_clock -add -name sys_clk_pin -period 83.333 -waveform {0 41.667} [get_ports { clk_in }]; ## LEDs set_property -dict { PACKAGE_PIN E18 IOSTANDARD LVCMOS33 } [get_ports { leds_out[0] }]; #IO_L16N_T2_A27_15 Sch=led[2] set_property -dict { PACKAGE_PIN F13 IOSTANDARD LVCMOS33 } [get_ports { leds_out[1] }]; #IO_L17P_T2_A26_15 Sch=led[3] set_property -dict { PACKAGE_PIN E13 IOSTANDARD LVCMOS33 } [get_ports { leds_out[2] }]; #IO_L17N_T2_A25_15 Sch=led[4] set_property -dict { PACKAGE_PIN H15 IOSTANDARD LVCMOS33 } [get_ports { leds_out[3] }]; #IO_L18P_T2_A24_15 Sch=led[5] ## Reset button set_property -dict { PACKAGE_PIN C18 IOSTANDARD LVCMOS33 } [get_ports { rst_in }]; #IO_L11N_T1_SRCC_15 ## Configuration options, can be used for all designs set_property BITSTREAM.CONFIG.CONFIGRATE 50 [current_design] set_property CONFIG_VOLTAGE 3.3 [current_design] set_property CFGBVS VCCO [current_design] set_property BITSTREAM.CONFIG.SPI_BUSWIDTH 4 [current_design] set_property CONFIG_MODE SPIx4 [current_design] set_property INTERNAL_VREF 0.675 [get_iobanks 34] ---------------- Any assistance would be much appreciated! Thanks, Curt Pehrson
  2. I'm using two inferred RAM modules which are assigned an initial state by reading lines from a file, as suggested to me previously here, in VHDL. The setup works fine, and all the RAM contents are loaded during synthesis properly. However, as my design is pretty large, it takes a lot of time to synthesize the project each time I need to only change the RAM initialization files. I need to synthesize very often while testing with different memory contents, my design being otherwise the same. Is there a way to only modify the memory contents of a design without having to synthesize the whole project? I tried using incremental builds but the improvement was not that effective.