Leaderboard


Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation since 01/10/19 in all areas

  1. 2 points
    Hi @Blake, I was struggling with the same problem. In Adam's project is mistake which result is an FMC-HDMI module is not recognizable by other devices. The reason for that is not sending EDID at all. The cause of this situation is wrong initialized EDID map. In Adams example EDID is initialized by: but the correct way is: the body of iic_write2 is from LK example: By the way, in LucasKandle example initialization is done in same way as in Adam's example so is the reason why it not worked in your case. I hope it will helps. If you want I will post my working code for a ZedBoard with FMC-HDMI when I clean it because at the moment is kind of messy.
  2. 2 points
    kwilber

    Pmod DA3 clocking

    It seems to me the AXI Quad SPI block is sending address + data. Looking at the .xci file again, I see C_SPI_MEM_ADDR_BITS set to 24 bits. So 24 bits of address and 16 bits of data would yield 40 bits.
  3. 2 points
    Hi @neocsc, Here is a verified Nexys Video HDMI project updated from Vivado 2016.4 to Vivado 2017.4. You should be able to find the updated project in the proj folder . Here is a GitHub project done in HDL using the clocking wizard, DVI2RGB and RGB2DVI IP Cores for another FPGA. Here is a unverified Nexys Video Vivado 2017.4 HDMI pass through project made from the linked Github project. In the next few days I should have the bandwidth to verify this project. thank you, Jon
  4. 2 points
    The warning you pasted is benign and simply means there are no ILAs present in your design. The real issue could be your clock. You should review the datasheet for the dvi2rgb.Table 1 in section 5 specifies RefClk is supposed to be 200Mhz. Also, your constraint should follow the recommendation in section 6.1 for a 720p design. Finally, @elodg gives some great troubleshooting information in this thread.
  5. 2 points
    Hi @akhilahmed, In the mentioned video tutorial, the leds are controlled using "xgpio.h" library but the application is standalone. If you want to use a linux based application you have to use linux drivers for controlling. In the current Petalinux build, which is used in SDSoC platform, UIO driver is the best approach. Steps: 1. Vivado project generation: - Extract .dsa archive from /path_to_sdsoc_platform/zybo_z7_20/hw/zybo_z7_20.dsa - Launch Vivado - In Tcl Console: cd /path_to_extracted_dsa/prj - In Tcl Console: source rebuild.tcl - In this point you should have the vivado project which is the hardware component of SDSoC platform. Open Block Design. Change to Address Editor Tab. Here you will find the address for axi_gpio_led IP: 0x4122_0000 2. Petalinux UIO driver: - Launch SDx - Import zybo-z7-20 SDSoC platform - Create a new SDx linux based project using a sample application (e.g. array_zero_copy) - Build the project - Copy the files from /Dubug/sd_card to SD card - Plug the SD card in Zybo Z7. Make sure that the JP5 is set in SD position. Turn on the baord - Use your favorite serial terminal to interact with the board (115200, 8 data bits, 2 stop bits, none parity) - cd to /sys/class/uio - if you run ls you will get something like: uio0 uio1 uio2 uio3 uio4 uio5 - Now you have to iterate through all these directories and to search for the above mentioned axi_gpio_led address: 0x4122_0000 - For example: cat uio0/maps/map0/addr will output: 0x41220000, which means that the axi_gpio_led can be accessed using linux uio driver through uio0 device. - Code: #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <sys/ioctl.h> #include <sys/mman.h> #include <stdint.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <fcntl.h> #define UIO_MEM_SIZE 65536 #define UIO_LED_PATH "/dev/uio0" void UioWrite32(uint8_t *uioMem, unsigned int offset, uint32_t data) { *((uint32_t*) (uioMem+offset)) = data; } uint32_t UioRead32(uint8_t *uioMem, unsigned int offset) { return *((uint32_t*) (uioMem+offset)); } void led_count_down(uint8_t *ledMem) { uint8_t count = 0xF; uint8_t index = 0; for (index = 0; index < 5; index++) { UioWrite32(ledMem, 0, count); count = count >> 1; sleep(1); } } int main() { // Set Leds as output int led_fd = open(UIO_LED_PATH, O_RDWR); uint8_t *ledMem = (uint8_t *) mmap( 0, UIO_MEM_SIZE, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, led_fd, (off_t)0); UioWrite32(ledMem, 4, 0x0); // Set all leds as output while(1) { // Start led count-down led_count_down(ledMem); } return 0; } - Build the project and copy the content of Debug/sd_card on SD sd_card - Power on the board and connect to it using a serial terminal - run the following commands: mount mmcblk0p1 /mnt cd /mnt ./project_name.elf - Result: A countdown should be displayed on leds.
  6. 1 point
    Hi @Lesiastas You should use higher sample rate to capture raw data than the UART rate. Otherwise due to clock jitter and signal slew rate the capture could be wrong. Imagine on sample could be captured exactly on bit start and next bit on the end of the same bit, instead of next bit start... Anyway, here I have modified the decodeUart to work with sample rate = uart rate, see the lines marked with ' ' ' ' Module Module1 Function decodeUart(ByRef rgData() As UShort, ByVal cSamplePerBit As Integer, ByVal pin As Integer) As List(Of Byte) Dim pData As Boolean Dim fData As Boolean = False Dim cSamples = rgData.Length Dim rgUart As New List(Of Byte) For i As Integer = 0 To cSamples - 1 Dim s = rgData(i) pData = fData fData = 1 And (s >> pin) If pData <> 0 And fData = 0 Then Dim bValue As Integer = 0 For b = 0 To 7 Dim ii = Math.Round(i + (1.499 + b) * cSamplePerBit) ''''' If ii >= cSamples Then Exit For End If s = rgData(ii) fData = 1 And (s >> pin) If fData Then bValue += (1 << b) End If Next rgUart.Add(bValue) i += cSamplePerBit * 9.499 - 1 ''''' 1 start + 8 bits + 0.5 stop -1 because For will increment End If Next Return rgUart End Function Sub Main() Dim hdwf As Long If FDwfDeviceOpen(-1, hdwf) = False Then Dim szError As String FDwfGetLastErrorMsg(szError) System.Console.WriteLine("Device open failed" & vbCrLf & szError, vbExclamation + vbOKOnly) End End If Const hzUart = 9600 Const hzRate = hzUart * 3 ''''' Const cSamples = 1000 Dim hzDI As Double FDwfDigitalInInternalClockInfo(hdwf, hzDI) FDwfDigitalInTriggerSourceSet(hdwf, trigsrcDetectorDigitalIn) FDwfDigitalInTriggerSet(hdwf, 0, 0, 0, &HFFFF) 'any falling edge 'FDwfDigitalInTriggerAutoTimeoutSet(hdwf, 10.0) FDwfDigitalInDividerSet(hdwf, hzDI / hzRate) FDwfDigitalInSampleFormatSet(hdwf, 16) FDwfDigitalInBufferSizeSet(hdwf, cSamples) FDwfDigitalInTriggerPositionSet(hdwf, cSamples - 10) FDwfDigitalInConfigure(hdwf, 1, 1) Dim sts As Byte While True If FDwfDigitalInStatus(hdwf, 1, sts) = 0 Then Return End If If sts = DwfStateDone Then Exit While End If End While FDwfDigitalInDividerGet(hdwf, hzRate) ' get the actual rate Const cSamplePerBit = hzRate / hzUart Dim rgData(cSamples) As UInt16 FDwfDigitalInStatusDataUShort(hdwf, rgData, 2 * rgData.Length) Call FDwfDeviceCloseAll() Dim rg0 = decodeUart(rgData, cSamplePerBit, 0) System.Console.Write("Hex 0: ") For i = 0 To rg0.Count - 1 System.Console.Write(" 0x" + Conversion.Hex(rg0(i))) Next System.Console.WriteLine() System.Console.WriteLine("Text 0: " + System.Text.Encoding.ASCII.GetString(rg0.ToArray)) End Sub End Module
  7. 1 point
    Hi @m72 The preview is further fixed. I hope there are no more issues with this: https://forum.digilentinc.com/topic/8908-waveforms-beta-download/ Here you have the project: EMU_2CH_EACH_V10 (2).dwf3work
  8. 1 point
    Hi @m72 The pulse preview is not correct. I will look into this. Thank you for the observations. You could use a custom bus or signals to easily create/modify such patterns.
  9. 1 point
    jpeyron

    GPS Pmod

    Hi @cepwin, I'm glad you we able to get to the bottom of the issue. Thank you for sharing what happened. cheers, Jon
  10. 1 point
    D@n

    Custom IP

    @PoojaN, You're not the first person who has asked this. If you just want to blink an LED, then I'd recommend a different approach that avoids all the pain with AXI in the first place. (You don't need AXI ...) If you want to start interacting with AXI cores, then you'll need to learn AXI. Sadly, this isn't as simple as it sounds. Xilinx picked the AXI bus to connect all their components with. This may have something to do with their ARM integration, since if I understand correctly AXI is an ARM creation AXI is not a simple bus to work with. Unlike Wishbone, it has five channels associated with it each of which can stall. These are the read address channel, the write address channel, the write data channel, the read response channel and the write response channel. One bus failure, and your device will lock up. In my experience, using an ARM+FPGA chip, lockups could only be fixed by cycling the power leaving you ever wondering what had caused the problem. Part of the problem is that the AXI standard has no way of recovering following a dropped response other than a total system reset. As I've implemented Wishbone, you can just adjust one wire (the cycle line--but that's another story) and start over. You can even use a timeout to clear the bus if a peripheral has not responded within an expected period of time. Not so with AXI. AXI is so difficult to work with that not even Xilinx could get it right. (See the links above) When I first discovered these bugs, I wondered that no one had found them before. For example, two writes in a row would lose a response and lock up the bus if ever there was the slightest amount of backpressure on the return channel. (Something Wishbone doesn't have to deal with, since there's no way to stall a Wishbone acknowledgement) It would seem as though very few individuals ever simulated their cores with backpressure (i.e. either BREADY or RREADY signals low), and so they never noticed these bugs. Similarly, some configurations of the interconnect might trigger the bugs while others wouldn't. Imagine adjusting the glue that holds your design together only to find your design starts failing. What would you blame? The interconnect, right? When in fact it was their demonstration core logic at fault that everyone was copying. I've now fielded several questions in the last several months alone on Xilinx's forums from users who've struggled with these bugs. If you do searches, you'll discover that folks have been struggling with these sorts of problems ever since Xilinx started using AXI. In one recent post, a software engineer posted that his FPGA engineer had left, leaving them with a "working" design. He then adjusted the software within the design and the whole design now froze any time he tried to write to their special IP core twice in succession. I'm hoping Xilinx will fix these bugs (soon). I haven't checked their latest release since reporting them, but I do expect them to fix the bugs in the near future. It's not just Xilinx either. I'm currently verifying the (ASIC) soft core of a major (unnamed) vendor. Much to my surprise, despite a team of highly paid professional engineers working to produce this amazingly complex core , and despite the fact that they created a simplified subset of the AXI interface standard to work with ... they still didn't get the AXI interface right. Realizing how difficult this was, I tried to simplify the task by creating a couple of cores. One showing how to build a bug-free AXI-lite slave (link above), another showing how to build a bug-free AXI slave (link above again). I also shared an AXI bridge implementation that, if you place your core downstream of it, you'd be guaranteed to meet the AXI protocol--even if it slowed you down a touch. I also shared the code for verifying that an AXI-lite component works--you are free to try it out yourself to know if your core still works after changing it. If you like using Wishbone, I've posted an AXI-lite to Wishbone bridge, or even a Wishbone to AXI bridge in case you want to access your DRAM memory. I also think you'll find that all of these cores, save perhaps the bus fault isolator core, will have better performance than Xilinx's logic ever had. Whether or not you use these options (or give up on AXI as I've tried to do) ... well, that's up to you. Forget what the sales brochures tell you, we aren't playing with legos here. There's more required to hook things together then just plugging them into each other--especially if you want something that works reliably when you are done. Just want something simple? Learn Verilog or VHDL. At least then you'll be the one responsible for your own bugs. Dan
  11. 1 point
    Impedance Analyzer v1.3.0.43 available for Download Currently, it only works with AD1 (cf. EEVblog AD2 not working with this great S/W). Would be great to get some advace from Digilent ,-) Best Ulli
  12. 1 point
    @sungsik, So let me shoot in the dark and ramble and see if it helps clarify your question. There are many ways you can design things on a Zynq. You can create state machines like you did before on the Spartan 6, making logic just like before that will work without a CPU. Indeed, you can still control I/Os like before if you want. The AXI GPIO core may be nice, but it is certainly not required. You can create AXI slave cores. Anything you create with a slave interface can be connected to the ARM in the Zynq and can interact with the ARM. This is typically very useful for controlling peripherals from the PS. You would write software commands to interact with your device, and off you go. This might be the easy way to interact with the AXI GPIO, but it is by no means the only way. There's also a discussion to be had about where the O/S / Application division will be within your software and how to write a proper device tree entry for IP cores that will be controlled from Linux. You can also create AXI master cores in PL. Your AXI masters can then be used to drive AXI slaves. So, for example, if you wanted to control the AXI GPIO as a state machine on board, all you would need to do is to connect an AXI master to it to do so. This would apply to any DDRx SDRAM as well. Yes, it is possible to connect an AXI master to multiple slaves, this requires an interconnect however. Which method you choose is up to you, the designer, and the specific and particular needs of your project. For example, logic is limited but fast, whereas software tends to be abundant but not nearly as fast. Further, most CPU software will produce (fairly) unpredictable timing, where as timing can be tightly controlled from the PL. Hopefully these ramblings will at least suggest where the conversation might go next. Dan
  13. 1 point
    yes, for an application with basic requirements, like receiver gain control this will probably work just fine (it's equivalent to an analog envelope detector). Now it needs a fairly high bandwidth margin between the modulation and the carrier, and that may make it problematic in more sophisticated DSP applications (say "polar" signal processing when I try to reconstruct the signal from the envelope) where the tolerable noise level is orders of magnitude lower.
  14. 1 point
  15. 1 point
    Hi @Ahmed Alfadhel I had the C code handy because I have been working on an atan2(y,x) implementation for FPGAs, and had been testing ideas. I left it in C because I don't really know your requirements, but I wanted to give you a working algorithm, complete with proof that it does work, and so you can tinker with it, see how it works, and make use of it. Oh, and I must admit that it was also because I am also lazy 😀 But seriously: - I don't know if you use VHDL or Verilog, or some HLS tool - I don't know if your inputs are 4 bits or 40 bits long, - I don''t know if you need the answer to be within 10% or 0.0001% - I don't know if it has to run at 40Mhz or 400Mhz - I don't know if you have 1000s of cycles to process each sample, or just one. - I don't even know if you need the algorithm at all! But it has been written to be trivially converted to any HDL as it only uses bit shifts and addition/subtraction. But maybe more importantly you can then use it during any subsequent debugging to verify that you correctly implemented it. For an example of how trivial it is to convert to HDL: if(x > 0) { x += -ty/8; y += tx/8;} else { x += ty/8; y += -tx/8;} could be implemented as IF x(x'high) = '0' THEN x := x - resize(y(y'high downto 3), y'length); y := y + resize(x(x'high downto 3), x'length); ELSE x := x + resize(y(y'high downto 3), y'length); y := y - resize(x(x'high downto 3), x'length); END IF My suggestion is that should you choose to use it, compile the C program, making the main() function a sort of test bench, and then work out exactly what you need to implement in your HDL., You will then spend very little time writing, debugging and improving the HDL because you will have a very clear idea of what you are implementing.
  16. 1 point
    attila

    Getting Input Phase Programmatically

    Hi @jamesbraza I constantly see the prefix `rg` in your programs. What is the meaning of `rg` prefix in all array namings? This are so called Hungarian notations originating from physics, to help identifying variable kinds like: rg Array, sz String, i Index, c Count Why does the gain term = V_C1 / V_C#? I would think it's the inverse... gain = output / input = V_C2 / V_C1 This is how the function returns it. You can convert it using 1.0/gain Does the formula you listed, M = gain2 - 1.0, come from a simplification of M = (V_C1 - V_C2) / (V_C2 - 0)? Yes. Also, please see the attached image. It's of input phase. Note sometimes the points are flipped about 360°. My final question is, do you know why this might be happening? The phase should be normalized to +/-PI. The next software version will correct this, but you can correct it in you script/application like this: if phase2.value > math.pi : phase2.value -= 2.0*math.pi if phase2.value < -math.pi : phase2.value += 2.0*math.pi Thank you for the observation.
  17. 1 point
    Hi, I just have opened a new terminal and launch minicom through the new terminal which works the same way as SDK terminal but I have to close the SDK terminal before connecting to minicom. Thanks @D@n and @jpeyron
  18. 1 point
    Nothing to worry about if only one is up at a time. It would mean that the frequencies of adjacent oscillators affect each other if they are running at the same time ("injection pulling", to the point that they agree on a common frequency ("locking"). Consider the oscillator as an amplifier with a feedback loop. The feedback path plus phase shift lead to a fairly narrow frequency response around the oscillation frequency or harmonically related frequencies). Weird things can happen with the gain - while it is unity in average steady-state operation, the circuit can get highly sensitive to external interference that is (near)-correlated with the oscillator's own signal. Wikipedia: Perhaps the first to document these effects was Christiaan Huygens, the inventor of the pendulum clock, who was surprised to note that two pendulum clocks which normally would keep slightly different time nonetheless became perfectly synchronized when hung from a common beam
  19. 1 point
    jpeyron

    Pmod da3 reconstruction filter

    Hi @lwew96, We have not used a reconstruction filter. I did find a paper that discusses a reconstruction filter with the AD5541 here. Hopefully one of the more experienced community members will have some input for you as well. best regards, Jon
  20. 1 point
    Hi @kuc3, Welcome to the Digilent Forums! I have moved your thread to a sub-section where more experienced embedded linux engineers look. best regards, Jon
  21. 1 point
    SmashedTransistors

    BASYS3 and Axoloti

    Thanks @OvidiuD, I'll take one step after another and the forums are quite a good source of knowledge. So far, I plan to start with very basic schemes in order to understand how Vivado works. Then I will work on communicating with the Axoloti through SPI. Best regards
  22. 1 point
    D@n

    Noisy Output from FIR Compiler

    @Ahmed Alfadhel, You have a couple of options available to you: It's not clear, from your pictures above, whether or not the -40dB stop band was achieved. Some amount of noise is to be expected due to truncation errors, etc. Without seeing an estimated PSD, I can't tell. It may be that it's doing exactly what you required of it. -40dB is only so good. With more taps, you should be able to go deeper. How deep depends upon your requirements. How good do you want the signal to look? You may also need to provide more bits to both your signal and coefficient values in order to do better. You did prescale your coefficients so that, when rounded to integers, the taps were useful, right? Also, be aware, the filter will be specified for full scale. You'll want to measure it against a full scale input. Anything less will introduce additional truncation error. This is one of those reasons why the dynamic range (i.e. number of bits) of the input and output signals are so important. Enjoy! Dan
  23. 1 point
    jpeyron

    ZedBoard and PmodCAN

    Hi @YellowYoung, Welcome to the Digilent forums! The PmodCAN facilitates CAN communication to another device through the PL.The PmodCAN uses SPI communication to communicate between the host board and itself. It would not be able to connect to the CAN on the PS. To use the CAN bus on the PS you would need to use the MIO Pmod JE1 as discussed in the user guide for the Zedboard here in section 2.9.2 Digilent Pmod Compatible Headers (2x6). The user guide states the bank that the MIO pins are connected to a 3.3V bank so you would need to make a level shifting circuit for CAN communication to work since CAN uses voltage level as part of its communication. If all you need to do is communicate data from the Zedboard using CAN communication. Then you can send data from the PS to the PL and then send that data through the PmodCAN. Here is an Avnet forum thread that discusses sending data from the PS to the PL. Here is a Xilinx forum thread that initially discusses how they accomplished sending data from the PS to the PL. best regards, Jon
  24. 1 point
    Yep, seen that they were back online. Thanks, Jon
  25. 1 point
    jomoengineer

    Howdy from NorCal

    Thanks Jon. And thanks for the links. Cheers, Jon
  26. 1 point
    The example I posted would work for Linux or Mac with "common" tools installed. As to Windows... can't really help much there. git's not part of Python, it's used for managing code; you can achieve the same end result here by downloading the ZIP from https://github.com/bdlow/dlog-utils-portable/archive/master.zip and unzipping to a folder. Virtual environment support is a standard part of Python 3; you can skip that if you like but without virtual environments eventually your Python installation will end up like this: https://xkcd.com/1987/ Ah, of course, in Windows `activate` is a batch script not a shell script: https://www.techcoil.com/blog/how-to-create-a-python-3-virtual-environment-in-windows-10/
  27. 1 point
    jpeyron

    hdmi ip clocking error

    Hi @askhunter, I did a little more searching and found a forum thread here where the customer is having a similar issue. A community member also posted a pass through zynq project that should be useful for your project. best regards, Jon
  28. 1 point
    For the Protocol / SPI-I2C /Spy mode you should specify the approximate (or highest) protocol frequency which will be used to filter transient glitches, like ringing on clock signal transition. The Errors you get indicate the signals are not correctly captured. - make sure to have proper grounding between the devices/circuits - use twisted wires (signal/ground) to reduce EMI - use logic analyzer and/or scope to verify the captured data / voltage levels at higher sample rate at least 10x the protocol frequency Like here in the Logic Analyzer you can see a case when the samples are noisy:
  29. 1 point
    HI xc6lx45: Well, to my surprise, when I got home and loaded the .BIT file onto the board...it works perfectly. [1:0]sw is changing the frequency the the led is blinking at properly. So this tells me that I don't quite have my testbed code done properly. I tried to attach it into this text but it kept getting reformatted so I've simply attached the actual file. If somebody could look at it and tell me what (if anything) I've done wrong I'd greatly appreciate it. THANKS! NOTE: In the actual module code, above, I had changed the CASE choices to the 0, 1st, 2nd and 3rd flip-flops in order to better see the led changing value on the wave panel. However I've changed the code back to the actual flip-flops I wanted; the 26th, 25th, 24th and 23rd flip-flops. As I said...the board is working perfectly now and the switch setting are appropriately changing the led blinking frequency. It HAS to be something wrong with the TestBench code...or me not using the simulator properly. THANKS MUCH! clock_divider.tb
  30. 1 point
    jpeyron

    VGA on Zybo

    Hi @Mukul, Here is a VHDL VGA project that has pixel clock frequencies for multiple resolutions. Here and here are non-digilent VGA tutorials. Here is a listing for different pixel frequencies and resolutions. best regards, Jon
  31. 1 point
    Hi @Phil_D Try calling to load the workspace and to run script one after the other. subprocess.Popen(['C:/Program Files/Digilent/WaveForms3/WaveForms.exe', 'phase_noise_237.dwf3work']) subprocess.Popen(['C:/Program Files/Digilent/WaveForms3/WaveForms.exe', '-runscript'])
  32. 1 point
    Hi @Jaraqui Peixe, Unfortunately, Digilent does not have the ability to obtain these licenses for you with regards to Xilinx negotiations. I do not doubt that the Spartan 3E Starter Boards you have are as good as new and work as such, but the reality is that last variant of ISE 14.7 that could support the FPGA chips on the Basys 2 and the Spartan 3E (both over 10 years old), was released by Xilinx back in 2013, so active support on these boards is limited as the required software will not install on newer OS's (at least the Windows variants anyway). As @xc6lx45, it is possible to make it work though. What I would probably recommend is looking into the newer 7 series boards, such as the Basys 3 (the most similar to the Basys 2) or if you would want access to more memory than is provided in BRAM, both the Arty A7 and the Nexys A7 have on-board DDR memory. All of these boards work with Microblaze and are supported by the free Vivado WebPACK from Xilinx (which is license-free if that is a factor for you and includes Microblaze). Naturally, there is no guarantee that the Vivado software that supports these Artix 7 FPGA chips will become end-of-life'd, but I can at least say from Digilent's end that I have not heard of this happening in the near future. Thanks, JColvin
  33. 1 point
    Hi, >> We are forced to work in assembly with picoblaze. you might have a look at the ZPU softcore CPU with GCC. The CPU is just a few hundred lines of code but most of its functionality is in software in the crt.o library in RAM. I understand it's quite well tested and has been used in commercial products. Not surprisingly, using an FPGA to implement a processor that then kinda emulates itself in software (aka RISC :) ) is maybe not the most efficient use of silicon - I'm sure it has many strong points but speed is not among them... Unfortunately, the broken-ness of Xilinx' DATA2MEM utility (to update the bitstream with a new .elf file) spoils the fun, at least when I tried in ISE14.7 (segfaults). When it works, the compile/build cycle takes only a second or two. Long-term, porting the processor to a new platform would be straightforward, or even fully transparent if using inferred, device-independent memory. This would also work for a bootloader that is hardcoded into default content in inferred RAM. I might consider this myself as a barebone "hackable" CPU platform strictly for educational purposes.
  34. 1 point
    Hi @askhunter, The top.vhd is already added to the project. If you are wanting this file to be underneath the design_1 then you should right click on the design_1 and select add sources. Then add the vhdl files you would like to add to the design. It might be easier to start with a fresh project. best regards, Jon
  35. 1 point
    jpeyron

    Nexys 2 - transistor part number

    Hi @CVu, Glad to hear that replacing the transistor fix the issue. Thank you for sharing what you did. best regards, Jon
  36. 1 point
    jpeyron

    Nexys 2 - transistor part number

    Hi @CVu, Welcome to the Digilent Forums! Q1 information is below: NTS2101P Single P-Channel Power Mosfet 1.4A, 8VSOT-323 (SC-70) best regards, Jon
  37. 1 point
    attila

    AD2 waveForms script

    Hi @omur // start capture and wait to be finished Logic1.single() Logic1.wait() // on AD by default the Logic Analyzer and Wavegen have the same 4064 buffer var datam = Logic1.Channels.Bus.data var data_norm = [] datam.forEach(function(v){data_norm.push(v/4095)}) plot1.Y1.data = data_norm Wavegen1.Channel1.Mode.text = "Custom" Wavegen1.Custom.set("mycustom", data_norm) Wavegen1.Channel1.Custom.Type.text = "mycustom" Wavegen1.run()
  38. 1 point
    You might have a look at Trenz Electronics "Zynqberry". I think they managed to get one of the cameras to work (not sure). What I do remember is that the board has some custom resistor circuitry to additional pins for the required low-speed signaling.
  39. 1 point
    kwilber

    Pmod DA3 clocking

    You may not have to build your own. That becomes a design decision that only you can make based on the requirements/specifications your design must meet. If the performance you are getting out of the Digilent IP meets your requirements, there is no reason to roll your own. On the other hand, if you are not able to meet your requirements and you are running up against limitations of the IP, then either look for a more performant IP or consider designing purpose specific logic. According to your measurements, it takes 40 bits sent at a rate of 3.125 Mhz for each update of the DAC. That is at least 12.8 microseconds per update. Take the inverse of that and you have a maximum update rate of 78,125 updates/second. Is that sufficient for your design?
  40. 1 point
    Hi @hello.parth, The Ethernet IP cores use the AXI BUS. You would need to implement the AXI BUS communication to interact with the Ethernet IP Cores. This is not an easy task. You do not need to use Microblaze or the Ethernet IP Cores to use the ethernet on the Nexys Video. Here is a community members( @hamster) VHDL GigabitTX project using the Nexys Video. thank you, Jon
  41. 1 point
    D@n

    Conflicting Voltages in Bank Arty-A7

    @zygot, @Ahmed Alfadhel is not using a Basys3 board, and so this is really a bad example of attaching one question to another post. @Ahmed Alfadhel appears to be using an Artix-A7 board. In that case, the sys_clk is properly constrained, but he may well have some of the DDR3 I/O pins improperly constrained. These are the pins located on Bank 35. I think the problem in this case is that @Ahmed Alfadhel has improperly constrained in DDR DQS pins. For example, ddr3_dqs_[0] should be set to pin N2, not to A6. Compounding the problem is the way these pins are hidden in a "board definition file" rather than in the XDC file, making it likely to have conflicting pin definitions. @Ahmed Alfadhel, If you are following Digilent's instructions, you might want to double check that you have the appropriate board definition file. If you are trying this on your own, using only an XDC file, then you might find these instructions valuable. Also, I would recommend you not attach unrelated issues to old posts. Perhaps the Digilent staff might be kind enough to separate these two issues into separate forum posts--since they really are quite different. For example, the Basys3 board doesn't have the DDR3 memory which is the source of your pin-connection troubles. Dan
  42. 1 point
    Hi @Mukul, Are you getting the Error while launching program: Memory write error at 0x100000. APB AP transaction error, DAP status f0000021? 1. Make sure the boot mode jumper JP5 is set to JTAG. If your Mode setting are JTAG and you are still having an issue then please attach a screen shot of your SDK errors? thank you, Jon
  43. 1 point
    are you maybe using a low-speed analog output with 200 ohms series resistor? Check the schematic of the board for a direct output.
  44. 1 point
    You can get the SDK to add a few example projects for any device in the system. Open the system.mss and click on the OS (the default is the standalone but you may have chosen another one when you created your BSP). Scroll down to the uart_x that you run through the PL and click on the demonstration examples. There is a nice variety of demonstrations and you probably want to add them all. The SDK will build these for the uart you selected. This is one nice feature of the SDK. If you chose another OS, such as the RTOS I'm not sure if examples are available. You likely want to use the interrupt driven example as a basis for your design ( depending on how you designed your overall software control). Of course, there are a lot of ways to arrange your communication protocol so I hope that you've spent some time thinking about how it will work. The simpler the better. Understand that the purpose of the example code is to show you the basic requirements to implement a particular interface and not to solve your problems... that is they are there for you to pore over and understand how they work. I can't send you code because your application is unique to you. If your SDK OS has a hardware abstraction layer then you will likely need to find other sources for example code. I rarely need (or want) a full-up OS like Linux for embedded applications. [edit] I should have mentioned that since you have at least two FPGA boards ( and ony you know what else ) you have a system. The basic system definition and design approach should be the first thing to flesh out. This includes inter-board communication; for instance are the boards peer-peer or is there a hierarchy? You can always tweak the system design if the lower level considerations demand it once you start fleshing out the actual implementation. If you haven't given any thought to the system interactions and structure then you are in for a lot of unnecessary work as the project nears integration.
  45. 1 point
    kotra sharmila

    sdsoc_opencv error

    Hi , Thank you very much for this platform its showing video i/o demo and build perfectly i will try with my own project if i got any doubts i will ask you. Regards, K Sharmila
  46. 1 point
    Hi @bklopp, Here is a completed Nexys Video UART interrupt project in Vivado 2018.2 that uses interrupts in microblaze. thank you, Jon
  47. 1 point
    jpeyron

    Custom Image Processing on Zybo-Z7 20

    Hi @Amin, I have not made a project like this. To get a Zybo-Z7-20 project working with the SD card: Make sure you are using the Digilent board files.Here is the installation tutorial for the board files. Your block design should be the just the Zynq processor with FCLK_CLK0 connected to the M_AXI GP0_ACLK as shown with the attached screen shot. Run block automation as default(board files) when the Digilent board files are being used. Then create a wrapper and generate a bitstream. Next export the hardware including the bitstream and launch SDK. In SDK you should be able to alter the main.c file attache above to work for your needs. If your goal is to use a standalone project i can assist with using the ZYNQ processor with the SD card. I would have to reach out to more experience engineers for assistance using HLS or non-prebuilt SDSoC project. If your project does not need to be standalone then I would suggest using either an embedded linux project like petalinux , a pre-built SDSoC project or the SDSoC reVISION platform. 1) Here is the Petalinux Support for Digilent Boards which has two version releases and a very detailed readme which should help you get the project going. 2) Here is the SDSoC Platforms which has a project completed for the Zybo-Z7-20. 3) Here is the SDSoC reVISION project for the Zybo-Z7-20. thank you, Jon
  48. 1 point
    Hi @Sami Malik, On Monday Ii will make a project and share it on this thread that I believe you are trying to do. thank you, Jon
  49. 1 point
    Hi @bklopp, 1) You do not need to use the JTAG HS2 to configure the Flash on the Nexys Video. I just saw the HS2 being mentioned in the txt file you attached. 2) I would also suggest leaving the spi mode for the QSPI flash IP set to Quad. thank you, Jon
  50. 1 point
    shahbaz

    How to read from SD card on ZYBO

    hi @jpeyron, I followed the guide at GitHub under Readme in PMODSD. can you please guide me step wise on how to start from block design and than going to SDK and running the demo. I have added the pmodsd and zynq PS IPs, after auto connection and running the generate bitstream I get following error. I need your guidance at this